Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 21:00:03 +0100 From: dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org (Dirk Meyer) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openssl DIST_SUBDIR change Message-ID: <4c9b5qc1mn@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org> References: <401084E5E73F4241A44F3C9E6FD79428A0A9F6EC@exch-01>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hallo Wall, Stephen,
> Is the recent name change in the openssl port's DIST_SUBDIR intentional, or a leftover from some intermediate test stage of the port? Seems like an odd change to make on purpose...
>
> > DIST_SUBDIR= ${DISTNAME}2
Yes that chage was intentional.
I change DIST_SUBDIR cause a distfile or patchfile file with the same name have different content.
Without that change,
users will try to fetch the old files from mirrors and later stop with a checksum error.
> Also, FYI for anyone who cares, the OpenSSL project has released a security update, version 1.0.1d.
> See http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-announce@openssl.org/msg00124.html for details.
Thanks i will look in to it.
kind regards Dirk
- Dirk Meyer, Im Grund 4, 34317 Habichtswald, Germany
- [dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org],[dirk.meyer@guug.de],[dinoex@FreeBSD.org]
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4c9b5qc1mn>