Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 19 Jun 2019 23:04:01 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ipfw@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 238694] Configuring & using a customized IPFW rule set now causes additional rles to be (involuntarily) added
Message-ID:  <bug-238694-8303-Xqs3dIy58G@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-238694-8303@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-238694-8303@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238694

--- Comment #3 from Rodney W. Grimes <rgrimes@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to rkoberman from comment #2)
Your ignoring the fact that though these rules MAY be needed the rc.firewall
script can not know where and at what rule numbers they need to be to funct=
ion
correctly with my custom written firewall.script invoked by
"firewall_type=3Dpathname".

In my custom firewall the loopback rules are NOT at 100,200.. but are infact
burried much deeper in other logic as running these rules for every packet =
is a
total waste of time since very little of my traffic is from or to lo0.

Your also assuming that someone is running the stuff you mention, and that =
is,
as the Primary Reported has stated, and I have acknowledge, a bad assumptio=
n.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-238694-8303-Xqs3dIy58G>