Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 22 May 2003 12:49:11 -0400
From:      David Vastine <dvastine@vastine.net>
To:        Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>
Cc:        Gnome-FreeBSD List <gnome@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: librsvg2-2.3.0 build failure, due to libgsf?
Message-ID:  <20030522164911.GA24991@vastine.net>
In-Reply-To: <1053568932.19335.10.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
References:  <20030521230849.GA21603@vastine.net> <1053568932.19335.10.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 10:02:13PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-05-21 at 19:08, David Vastine wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > 	On a fresh install of 5.0-Release with up to date ports and then an
> > update to the marcuscom ports for gnome 2.3.1 I am getting the
> > following:
> > 
> > 
> > ===>   Running ldconfig
> > /sbin/ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib
> > ===>   Registering installation for libgsf-1.8.0
> > ===>   Returning to build of librsvg2-2.3.0
> > Error: shared library "gsf-1.8" does not exist
> > *** Error code 1
> > 
> > Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/librsvg2.
> > *** Error code 1
> > 
> > Hopefully that is enough info for this one.. Let me know if you need
> > anything else.. Thanks.
> 
> Make sure you ports tree has been completely cvsup'd.  The new shared
> lib version of gsf is 9, and that is reflected in the current librsvg2
> Makefile.
> 
> Joe
> 

	Ahh.. it appears the Makefile for librsvg2 in the marcuscom tree
still mentions 8 for 2.3.0 whereas the 'non-beta' 2.2.5 mentions 9..

David



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030522164911.GA24991>