Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 3 Oct 2014 07:07:20 +0800
From:      Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
To:        James Gritton <jamie@gritton.org>
Cc:        freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: no network connection from inside a jail
Message-ID:  <20141003070720.20526c18@X220.alogt.com>
In-Reply-To: <542D70B8.1090603@gritton.org>
References:  <20141002180506.4965760b@X220.alogt.com> <542D70B8.1090603@gritton.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

On Thu, 02 Oct 2014 09:35:20 -0600
James Gritton <jamie@gritton.org> wrote:

> On 10/2/2014 4:05 AM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> >
> > I recently upgraded to 10.1 BETA3 via sources. All seemed to be fine
> > until I started jails which connect to the Internet. It simply does
> > not work anymore. When the browser from the jail connects to
> > another jail on the same machine via HTTP, it all works. Accesses
> > to the ouside of the machine fails.
> >
> 
> Having looked at an svn diff between BETA1 and BETA3, I'm at a loss.
> The only change involving jails was a few lines that tested a
> condition for a locking issue in the kernel (r271622).  I also looked
> for any changes to lagg, on a hunch the problem might be there, but
> found nothing changed there either.
> 
oh thanks. It all is really weird. The last thing I did was building an
image for a Raspberry. I have not the slidest imagination how this
could affect the machine so that all other things still work but not
the network inside a jail. Of course, installing an ARM binary will
ruin the machine as such but not just one little function.

Erich



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20141003070720.20526c18>