Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 16 May 1998 13:24:39 +0200
From:      Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>
To:        Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf param.c src/sys/kern uipc_domain.c uipc_proto.c uipc_socket.c uipc_socket2.c uipc_usrreq.c src/sys/netinet in_pcb.c in_pcb.h ip_divert.c raw_ip.c tcp_subr.c tcp_var.h udp_usrreq.c udp_var.h src/sys/sys socketvar.h un.h ...
Message-ID:  <19980516132439.41449@follo.net>
In-Reply-To: <199805152020.QAA02956@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>; from Garrett Wollman on Fri, May 15, 1998 at 04:20:56PM -0400
References:  <199805152011.NAA12272@freefall.freebsd.org> <199805152020.QAA02956@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 15, 1998 at 04:20:56PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> <<On Fri, 15 May 1998 13:11:41 -0700 (PDT), Garrett Wollman <wollman@FreeBSD.ORG> said:
> >   Define a parameter which indicates the maximum number of sockets in a
> >   system, and use this to size the zone allocators used for sockets and
> >   for certain PCBs.
> 
> This is called `maxsockets', and is currently defined to be the
> maximum of `maxfiles' and `nmbclusters'.  Suggestions for a better
> value would be appreciated.

What would be necessary to make it possible for this to be a dynamic
datastructure, instead of having a maximum limit?

Eivind.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980516132439.41449>