Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:27:41 -0300 From: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Cc: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is a "sane" setting for maxdsize when running amd64? it seems many normal suggestions do not apply. Message-ID: <200708221127.42627.joao@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <b41c75520708220432l5ac94405tff84e771871d0a91@mail.gmail.com> References: <835936.35104.qm@web34510.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <46CC16F6.7020904@micom.mng.net> <b41c75520708220432l5ac94405tff84e771871d0a91@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 08:32:05 Claus Guttesen wrote: > > >> You should configure squid to use no more than about 60 - 70% of the > > >> available physical RAM-- ie, set the cache_mem parameter to about 2.5 > > >> or 3GB. > > > > > > Better yet, don't run Squid at all. > > > > Ok, then what do you recommend instead of Squid? > > Varnish. > > http://varnish.projects.linpro.no/ that certainly is a really hotty for caching :) =2D-=20 Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200708221127.42627.joao>