Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 13:47:04 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rsync vs installworld Message-ID: <20031020134508.P36677@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <20031020.031124.05471800.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20031018.192827.118920091.imp@bsdimp.com> <20031020.031124.05471800.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: MWL> In message: <200310200705.JAA06855@galaxy.hbg.de.ao-srv.com> MWL> Helge Oldach <helge.oldach@atosorigin.com> writes: MWL> : Rsync doesn't deal with file flags (chflags(2)). Thus my personal MWL> : preference for updating machines is making installworld on a file system MWL> : exported by the build server. MWL> MWL> I'm looking for ways to avoid having NFS run on the network in MWL> question at all. netpipe by dds@ then? The first drawback of course is that netpipe opens back-connection which isn't good for strict firewalls, but I think this could be avoided by inventing something like "passive netpipe" mode... Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031020134508.P36677>