Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:49:51 -0500 From: "Matt Sealey" <matt@genesi-usa.com> To: "'Mark Linimon'" <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, 'Bill Milford' <freebsd@milfordmail.com> Subject: RE: graphics/linux-dri on 4.11 Message-ID: <022c01c6a1f6$261e8940$99dfdfdf@bakuhatsu.net> In-Reply-To: <20060707184316.GC18488@soaustin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yeah wouldn't a solution be to have bsdtar have a PORT_REPLACES_BASE kind of thing? Or a use.tar like use.perl? -- Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa.com> Manager, Genesi, Developer Relations > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Linimon [mailto:linimon@lonesome.com] > Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 1:43 PM > To: Matt Sealey > Cc: 'Mark Linimon'; ports@freebsd.org; 'Bill Milford' > Subject: Re: graphics/linux-dri on 4.11 > > On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 01:33:55PM -0500, Matt Sealey wrote: > > Well this is a kind of internal-to-ports thing that needs a small > > change, not really a "fix linux-dri" thing. It could happen with > > plenty of packages, so who deals with that? > > There is no individual who's on the hook for that, exactly. > > What happens if you try to add a dependency on > archivers/libarchive and change tar to bsdtar? > > mcl >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?022c01c6a1f6$261e8940$99dfdfdf>