Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 14:17:17 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Possible updating of "mount_smbfs" Message-ID: <74ad82b9-719d-6acd-c371-bcf6515a0d57@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <BL0PR20MB2098022390FEB4070058D99A80D70@BL0PR20MB2098.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> References: <DM5PR20MB21024CFFA05B729FD51C876080D60@DM5PR20MB2102.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <20181126012820.2f862cc2.freebsd@edvax.de> <BL0PR20MB2098022390FEB4070058D99A80D70@BL0PR20MB2098.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 26/11/2018 12:02, Carmel NY wrote: > Honestly, it it is not updated to work with SMB3 or better, it is for all > practical purposes, impotent. Perhaps, FreeBSD 12 would be a logical place to > put the utility to bed. FreeBSD 12.0 is almost out the door, and the chance to make such changes there is long gone. FreeBSD 12.1 or 13.0 would be where mount_smbfs could be removed, and now is actually a pretty good point at which to propose deprecating SMBv1 support for those versions. Traditionally, that starts by sending an e-mail to freebsd-arch@... -- if you'ld like to be credited for the suggestion, please by all means do propose removing mount_smbfs there. Of course, it will need a src committer to actually do the deed, but that's not likely to be a major obstacle. Cheers, Matthew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?74ad82b9-719d-6acd-c371-bcf6515a0d57>