Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 12:00:06 +0000 From: xorquewasp@googlemail.com To: Mikle Krutov <nekoexmachina@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i386 wine on amd64 - DRI a lost cause? Message-ID: <20100701120006.GA28132@logik.internal.network> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinciz7Qzlb9gVsHtgRKWMXVWD258nyfaMqxWapu@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100624121141.GA40498@logik.internal.network> <AANLkTineUZt_BsceUMwM1XoAQ9MA5CVeyC7CUOj4Ve00@mail.gmail.com> <20100624232839.GA53471@logik.internal.network> <AANLkTinciz7Qzlb9gVsHtgRKWMXVWD258nyfaMqxWapu@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2010-07-01 15:28:00, Mikle Krutov wrote: > Sorry for late-answer, but why are you running wine in jail? > May be that's the source of the problem. > For me, it was just installed into /usr/local/ as some other > program, some 32bit libs were in lib32, and so on. As mentioned, I've tried it in a jail, a plain chroot and also completely unchrooted and unjailed. Wine itself works fine but DRI doesn't. I recently wrote to freebsd-hackers@ and the response wasn't exactly positive. Seems 32-bit DRI is basically expected to fail when talking to a 64-bit kernel. Wine's not the one at fault here. Regards, xw
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100701120006.GA28132>