Date: Sat, 05 Dec 1998 00:00:36 +0900 From: Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh <itojun@itojun.org> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> Cc: "Open Systems Inc." <opsys@open-systems.net>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> Subject: Re: Can we just come to a decision on IPv6 and IPSec? Message-ID: <5749.912783636@coconut.itojun.org> In-Reply-To: jkh's message of Thu, 03 Dec 1998 18:07:08 PST. <2283.912737228@zippy.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Anyway, even if the project ends, I certainly will maintain KAME tree >> (KAME was maintained in my home last year) and I'm a FreeBSD committer. >OK, well, here's the $10,000 question (as we say in the U.S.): >Assuming that a decision was made to just go with the KAME code (and >I'm not implying that it has been), how soon could this code enter >-current and how soon, in your opinion, would it be before it was >integrated well enough to be fully functional? >I'm thinking this might be a perfect post-branch activity (IPv6 would >be a 3.1 feature) which means that any time after mid-January would be >a good time. As Inoue-san (shin@kame.net) pointed out, KAME on 3.0 is almost ready, We are about to make TCPv4/v6 work (as I wrote in some of previous batch of emails we needed to port KAME patches from scratch, to sync with bunch of changes from 2.2.x to 3.x). I believe we should merge in at least after TCPv4/v6 start working on KAME on 3.0, and we will be ready before new year's day. itojun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5749.912783636>