Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 14:44:48 -0500 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: Fbsd8 <fbsd8@a1poweruser.com> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, Luciano Mannucci <luciano@vespaperitivo.it> Subject: Re: NAT question Message-ID: <CA%2BtpaK3fEWagNRKy-C3GOe2Xfa=vt=6Jbq9r7ZaezwOsNpqzxw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <53EBB8FF.6040504@a1poweruser.com> References: <3hYH0x3vTtzCy1h@baobab.bilink.it> <CA%2BtpaK0%2BYnEzagH--VnyNqpYArH2eVnmVhQEcR3ST8yYtRJZ%2Bw@mail.gmail.com> <53EBB8FF.6040504@a1poweruser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Fbsd8 <fbsd8@a1poweruser.com> wrote: > Adam Vande More wrote: > >> >> You might want to use a more integrated and supported FW such as IPFW or >> PF >> to do NAT. >> >> >> >> Disregard that last post. > Yes, disregard the several times ipfilter has nearly gone extinct(at least in FreeBSD base), and hope very strongly it's maintainer doesn't lose interest, have a couple of kids, or get a more demanding job. Forget the the firewalls that are equally or even more capable and have a bigger dev team with long term interests in keeping them going. Keep your fingers crossed. -- Adam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BtpaK3fEWagNRKy-C3GOe2Xfa=vt=6Jbq9r7ZaezwOsNpqzxw>