Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 12:27:18 -0700 (MST) From: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: nate@root.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf options src/sys/i386/acpica Makefile acpi_wakecode.S src/sys/i386/conf NOTES Message-ID: <20031030122318.J11750@pooker.samsco.home> In-Reply-To: <20031030.120158.98361878.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20031029.232311.115991039.imp@bsdimp.com> <20031029.234108.97396294.imp@bsdimp.com> <20031030102144.L89089@root.org> <20031030.120158.98361878.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20031030102144.L89089@root.org> > Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> writes: > : On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > In message: <20031029.232311.115991039.imp@bsdimp.com> > : > M. Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> writes: > : > : The "general silliness of compiling SMP for all modules" was a design > : > : decision for SMPng made a long time ago. That's why there's no longer > : > : a SMP kernel option. > : > > : > Actually, I'm smoking crack here. Forget I said it. > : > > : > We do, however, don't use the lock prefix on UP kernels. Instead, > : > modules call the atomic functions, rather than inlining them. > : > : Whatever you smoke, the bounty is now up to $40, thanks to another donor. > : Let's see some code! > > I'll clean up what I have and commit it. > > Warner > > Please, if you're going to do this, do it 100%. Peter had some interesting ideas with unifying the building process of the kernel and modules and making the two basically indistinguishable. This would likely get rid of the #ifdef KLD_MODULE hacks running around too. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031030122318.J11750>