Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 05:57:37 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: wkoszek@freebsd.org, spam@rm-rf.kiev.ua, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, rwatson@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Improved INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE Message-ID: <88951.1175407057@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:06:22 CST." <20070331.160622.-30982624.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20070331.160622.-30982624.imp@bsdimp.com>, "M. Warner Losh" writes: >In message: <20070324153108.P4956@fledge.watson.org> > Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> writes: >: >> By the way, any plan to include INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE in GENERIC? >: > >: > I'd like to have this enabled by default, and I know there should be no >: > strong objections. >: >: I agree -- the memory used by it is very small compared to the amount of >: memory in modern systems, and the potential administrative benefit is very >: large. As long as it remains an option, the embedded folk can turn it off >: easily. > >Agreed, with both my large system and embedded hats on :-) Feature request: If the config is included, stuff it in the minidump ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?88951.1175407057>