Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Jul 1999 17:00:04 -0500 (CDT)
From:      "M. L. Dodson" <bdodson@beowulf.utmb.edu>
To:        Guy Middleton <guy@obstruction.com>
Cc:        questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: HP Laserjet 2100 printer with ghostscript
Message-ID:  <199907272200.RAA00327@beowulf.utmb.edu>
In-Reply-To: <199907272123.QAA94946@beowulf.utmb.edu>
References:  <19990726232115.A15778@chaos.obstruction.com> <199907271421.JAA91253@beowulf.utmb.edu> <19990727161514.A18990@chaos.obstruction.com> <19990727163521.A19232@chaos.obstruction.com> <199907272050.PAA94582@beowulf.utmb.edu> <19990727171032.A19477@chaos.obstruction.com> <199907272123.QAA94946@beowulf.utmb.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
M. L. Dodson writes:
 > Guy Middleton writes:
 >  > On Tue, Jul 27, 1999 at 04:50:25PM -0400, M. L. Dodson wrote:
 >  > > Also, since I've put the 2100 on, ghostscript seems to suck up a
 >  > > lot more cpu than I remember it doing in the past (feeding ink
 >  > > jet printers).  X becomes quite unusable during the print job (no
 >  > > mouse responsiveness at all, even with gs niced to 15).  I
 >  > > thought that might be due to the change to ppbus from the old lpt
 >  > > driver of 2.2.x fame (This is a, not too recent, 3.2-STABLE box).
 >  > 
 >  > Hmm.  This is happening to me too.  I tried doing lptcontrol -p, which
 >  > seemed to help, but I may be imagining things.
 >  > 
 >  > 
 > 
 > Well lptcontrol -e definitely made a difference in the
 > responsiveness of X to the mouse.  Still a noticeable slowdown
 > (and gs is still niced to 15), but a definite improvement if your
 > hardware supports it.
 > 

Well, to follow up on my own posting, a review of log files
indicates that lptcontrol -e wants to use an unsupported mode of
my hardware, so was equivalent to lptcontrol -p.  So I can
confirm that you are not imagining things.  Seems to be something
in interrupt-mode printer driver handling, which seems to me to
indicate that this is _not_ likely 2100-specific.  A visit to the
mailing list archives seems in order.

-- 
M. L. Dodson                                bdodson@scms.utmb.edu
409-772-2178                                FAX: 409-772-1790


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907272200.RAA00327>