Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 21:40:02 -0700 (PDT) From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: misc/39202: ata(4) refer to sysctl(8) instead of atacontrol(8). Message-ID: <200206150440.g5F4e2937570@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR misc/39202; it has been noted by GNATS. From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> To: Cyrille Lefevre <cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net> Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, sos@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: misc/39202: ata(4) refer to sysctl(8) instead of atacontrol(8). Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 05:32:59 +0100 > why do you get rid of this sample section, that I've translated to > atacontrol(8) equivalents, which may help many people having troubles > w/ ATA modes ? I was really just suggesting that we sync up ata(4) with -current. > an alternative would be to move it to a true EXAMPLES section in > atacontrol(8) ? I think adding them to the examples section of atacontrol would probably be a better idea, though Soren might have a better informed opinion. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200206150440.g5F4e2937570>