Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 10:35:21 -0300 From: "Ass.Tec. Matik" <asstec@matik.com.br> To: "Luigi Rizzo" <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, "Ass.Tec. Matik" <asstec@matik.com.br> Subject: Re: ipfw error in last stable version freebsd 8 Message-ID: <0f5adead3d79b18f822d224fd08785d0.squirrel@wm.matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <20100401125929.GA66321@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> References: <4BB24C86.3030709@hardonline.com.br> <20100331020943.GA47928@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20100331164302.GA55699@korolev-net.ru> <20100331170221.GB55010@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <cd82fc45e95950cb83326ef7c1f28323.squirrel@wm.matik.com.br> <20100401002014.GA57424@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <ca289b41257e17cf3f3ee6a3638e1586.squirrel@wm.matik.com.br> <20100401125929.GA66321@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 04:50:45AM -0300, Ass.Tec. Matik wrote: >> >> seems to be some more confusion >> >> >> 00002 rule >> ..... other rules >> 01000 rule >> ..... other rules >> 00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0 >> 00000 ip from any to any >> >> >> the last as I said in my former msg but the #00100 is listed at the end, not >> at it's correct sorted position, seems sticks to _when_ added > > i fixed this problem (which is related to all the reports > you are posting) tuesday night in svn 205953. great! > By chance are you still running an older kernel ? > no, buildworld and make kernel by the book :) Joćo Martins Eng.Resp.Helpdesk e Suporte Matik https://suporte.matik.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0f5adead3d79b18f822d224fd08785d0.squirrel>