Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 09:30:56 +0100 From: Norman Gray <norman.gray@glasgow.ac.uk> To: Victor Sudakov <vas@mpeks.tomsk.su> Cc: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: The recommended LaTeX port? Message-ID: <8929E48B-15EF-47C7-9F4E-044C0261EA17@glasgow.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20180820015337.GA24423@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> References: <20180819134150.GA18805@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <20180819161317.9bfdac7f.freebsd@edvax.de> <20180820015337.GA24423@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greetings. On 20 Aug 2018, at 2:53, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Which is *the* \LaTeX distribution for FreeBSD currently? I don't know specifically about the 'for FreeBSD' part, but I can make a couple of points about (La)TeX variants. TeXLive is currently the dominant TeX distribution. The canonical source of that is <http://tug.org/texlive/>. As mentioned earlier in this thread 'latex' can use only EPS files as images, but 'pdflatex' can use a variety of formats _excluding_ EPS. However ps2pdf can convert EPS files to PDF, ready for inclusion using pdflatex. I think it's fair to say that pdflatex is used much more commonly than latex, except in those cases (for example in some journal submissions) where one must fit in with an EPS-only workflow. Generally (and certainly in the TeXLive distribution), latex and pdflatex are the same program, distinguished by the default (but changeable) value of \pdfoutput: in either program, \pdfoutput=0 produces DVI output, and \pdfoutput=1 produces PDF. You might be interested, Victor, in xe(la)tex or lua(la)tex, which are also in TeXLive. These are two friendly forks of TeX which use Unicode internally -- so the source file can be cyrilllic with no \usepackage{inputenc} complications. Both XeTeX and LuaTeX also use platform fonts, rather than only TeX or postscript fonts, which can be very convenient, if you're not concerned with making your source document portable. There are a few interesting features which are unique to either XeTeX or LuaTeX -- both of these are, in a sense, the laboratories of the TeX world -- but the fonts capability which they both have is the one that most people are interested in. If your goal is to produce documents with Cyrillic content, as painlessly as possible, than I think you'd be best using XeTeX or LuaTeX, and restraining yourself from doing anything fancy with fonts. Best wishes, Norman -- Norman Gray : https://nxg.me.uk SUPA School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, UK
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8929E48B-15EF-47C7-9F4E-044C0261EA17>