Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 Jun 2010 01:17:13 +0300
From:      Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
To:        Navdeep Parhar <np@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: amd64 kernel modules: mapping sections to addresses
Message-ID:  <4C1FE4E9.8080400@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100621220035.GA8746@hub.freebsd.org>
References:  <4C1F798C.7010204@freebsd.org> <201006211143.26459.jhb@freebsd.org> <4C1F8BDD.9010408@freebsd.org> <201006211610.45811.jhb@freebsd.org> <20100621204435.GA98177@hub.freebsd.org> <4C1FDAF9.3080808@freebsd.org> <20100621220035.GA8746@hub.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 22/06/2010 01:00 Navdeep Parhar said the following:
> 
> I'm not so sure about this.  There is code inside the second switch that runs
> whether sh_size is 0 or not.  Either all of it is pointless code (when sh_size
> is 0) or or you'll make sure that it still runs, right?

It's definitely pointless.
[IMHO :-)]
-- 
Andriy Gapon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C1FE4E9.8080400>