Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2000 01:17:15 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Cc: karl@Denninger.Net, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-) Message-ID: <26939.946772235@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 01 Jan 2000 09:47:40 PST." <200001011747.JAA45272@vashon.polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200001011747.JAA45272@vashon.polstra.com>, John Polstra writes: >In article <20000101113750.B89903@Denninger.Net>, >Karl Denninger <karl@Denninger.Net> wrote: >> >> It looks like ntpd (the new one) works correctly; I grabbed the latest >> from the official site last night and by this morning the dispersion >> and offsets were stable. > >BTW, you might want to add these lines (from LINT) to your kernel >config if you haven't already: > >##################################################################### ># POSIX P1003.1B > ># Real time extensions added int the 1993 Posix ># P1003_1B: Infrastructure ># _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING: Build in _POSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING ># _KPOSIX_VERSION: Version kernel is built for > >options "P1003_1B" >options "_KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING" >options "_KPOSIX_VERSION=199309L" > >Current versions of ntpd use these features if they're available. I >think "_KPOSIX_VERSION=199309L" is the default, so that one probably >isn't strictly necessary. I seriously doubt using these will do anything for NTPDs performance. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?26939.946772235>