Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 16:46:53 -0400 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> To: Randy Pratt <rpratt1950@earthlink.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about portlint WARN/FATAL errors Message-ID: <20040710204653.GO58303@toxic.magnesium.net> In-Reply-To: <20040710163632.6ef6ec79.rpratt1950@earthlink.net> References: <20040710160201.77ab4eaa.rpratt1950@earthlink.net> <200407101520.17278.linimon@lonesome.com> <20040710163632.6ef6ec79.rpratt1950@earthlink.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> (07.10.2004 @ 1636 PST): Randy Pratt said, in 1.3K: << > Some time ago, I made a few local "ports" just > to get a feel for how the port mechanisms worked and assumed that one > of the objectives before submitting a port was to appease portlint. >> end of "Re: Question about portlint WARN/FATAL errors" from Randy Pratt << It is. Some ports are old, and were created before many of the standards we use today. If you submit a new port, it should pass portlint. Good coding practice is vital, even with make. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org adamw@vectors.cx || adamw@gnome.org http://www.vectors.cx
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040710204653.GO58303>