Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:02:42 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn <gary.jennejohn@freenet.de> To: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> Cc: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/compat6x port no longer sufficient for DRI under head? Message-ID: <20090917190242.4b79e1ba@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <20090917161519.GB1212@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <20090917134924.GZ1212@albert.catwhisker.org> <20090917170431.47be4a06@ernst.jennejohn.org> <20090917152957.GA1212@albert.catwhisker.org> <b269bc570909170832u792f851fk4ace6bfa4c9a7321@mail.gmail.com> <20090917161519.GB1212@albert.catwhisker.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:15:19 -0700 David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 08:32:09AM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote: > > ... > > Have you tried re-enabling hald and dbus and configuring X to use those? > > No, I haven't. > > One of the reasons I stopped trying to use hald(8) was that when I > booted head, hald went into a 100% CPU busy loop. (Mind, this was with > hald built inder stable/6.) > The current hald behaves much better. I saw the problem of 100% CPU usage a few months (weeks?) ago too, but now hald uses virtually no CPU. Of course, my hald was made with sources from head, so YMMV. --- Gary Jennejohn
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090917190242.4b79e1ba>