Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 11:59:45 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Oliver von Bueren <maillist@ovb.ch> Cc: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Support of ISDN Subsystem under Freebsd 6.x/7.x - amd64 Message-ID: <20071202115320.P81630@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <47529779.3070901@ovb.ch> References: <474EE92C.3000406@merlin-home.dtdns.net> <47514B53.9000409@ovb.ch> <20071201153523.15682288@peedub.jennejohn.org> <200712011820.09373.hselasky@c2i.net> <47529779.3070901@ovb.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Oliver von Bueren wrote: Hi, > So for me it's the choice of having old code in the tree, which kind of works > but does not cover my needs anymore OR move on and incorporate a newer > version having moved into the current days with support of hardware that is > available. Or does someone still use the 8bit Teles ISA ISDN card? I have > once, but they are long gone, don't have a system with ISA anymore. I still have some Teles cards around and they have been working fine, so why should I replace them? I don't need a PCIE only quad core machine to drive an ISDN line. That said, what would "your needs" be? List them. All. With details. People need to know about them. > view. Integrating it into the main tree would perhaps attract some more > developers and it would be possible to have it on all builds, amd64 included, > as a working stack, if enough interest is around. If there would be enough interest, more people would have stood up and - helped with the current code - helped hps with his code to get it in - ... No, there is great demand but only few hands. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT Software is harder than hardware so better get it right the first time.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071202115320.P81630>