Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 01:10:45 -0800 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> To: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: /usr/local/share/mk ? Message-ID: <20070202011045.A91980@xorpc.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <20070202115752.738ac6ac.stas@FreeBSD.org>; from stas@FreeBSD.org on Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 11:57:52AM %2B0300 References: <20070201111727.B83474@xorpc.icir.org> <20070201192051.GA72926@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070201113720.D83474@xorpc.icir.org> <20070201194417.GA73296@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070201123026.C84181@xorpc.icir.org> <20070201204153.GA74138@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070201140124.A85626@xorpc.icir.org> <20070202115752.738ac6ac.stas@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 11:57:52AM +0300, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:01:24 -0800 > Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> mentioned: > > > > typo.. thanks. Speaking of names, what's best for the devel/ thing ? > > linux-bsd-kmod looks like just another module. Should i call it > > linux-kmod-compat or bsd-linux-kmod instead ? > > > > Personally, I think linux-kmod-compat or linux-kmod-devkit would > sound better. BTW, I believe this should live in compat, not devel. we don't seem to have a "compat" ports category, don't we ? and i don't think this goes into the base system, or at least i don't have a good clue on the licensing issues yet - there are things i have rewritten from scratch, there are others (headers mostly, plus short inline functions) i just copied from GPL sources, and the modules themselves that you can build generally come from GPL sources. A port seems the safest option from that point of view... cheers luigi > PS: thanks for working on a such useful thing! > > -- > Stanislav Sedov > ST4096-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070202011045.A91980>