Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Oct 2001 12:17:25 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Kenneth Wayne Culver <culverk@wam.umd.edu>
To:        Alfatrion <alfatrion@cybertron.tmfweb.nl>
Cc:        "Maine LOA List Admin (Brent Bailey)" <brentb@loa.com>, "Hartmann, O." <ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: IPFW or IPFILTER?
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.21.0110121216390.27495-100000@sun10pg2.wam.umd.edu>
In-Reply-To: <3BC700CE.8000201@cybertron.tmfweb.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Alfatrion wrote:

> Maine LOA List Admin (Brent Bailey) wrote:
> 
> > I tried IPFILTER for awhile ...and it very easy to use...but ..in my opinion
> > it isnt as configurable as IPFW.
> > IPFW is a little more to setup ...but still pretty easy ...and the syntax
> > isnt that hard to understand. Its best feature is its VERY
> > configurable...and as long as you keep logging to a minimum ...it doesnt use
> > alot of resources.
> > Seems its memeory intensive than anything ...running a firewall that is
> > 
> 
> I find IPF more configurable as IPFW. I don't know how to do the 
> folowing in IPFW: pass out quick on tun0 proto tcp from any to any keep 
> state.
> 
IPFW has state keeping, but I don't think it's anywhere as easy to get it
working right.

Ken

> Alex
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.21.0110121216390.27495-100000>