Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 4 Apr 2002 17:30:06 -0800
From:      George Hartzell <hartzell@kestrel.alerce.com>
To:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   4.5 release vs. stable and anonymous cvs.
Message-ID:  <15532.65054.35264.516429@rosebud.alerce.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

I'm trying to use anonymous CVS to track the 4.5 RELEASE tree, not the
tip of the stable tree.  I've convinced myself that I know how to do
it using cvsup, but I'd like to explore the finer control that I get
through cvs itself.

I checked out the tree w/ a -r RELENG_4_5, discovered a bug in
Makefile.inc1, updated and picked up a *bunch* of updates, and just
found that installworld is failing (Signal 12 in usr.bin/chpass, still
looking into it).  All of this makes me think that maybe I'm tracking
-STABLE, not the 4.5 RELEASE.

Checking /usr/src/Makefile (cvs status -f Makefile), the first
existing tag is "RELENG_4_5_0_RELEASE", which suggests that it's on
the release branch, but I'm not convinced.

Can someone enlighten me about tagging/branching in the source tree,
and give me a pointer about maintaining a RELEASE tree via cvs?

g.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15532.65054.35264.516429>