Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 13 Apr 2013 17:23:38 -0400
From:      Quartz <quartz@sneakertech.com>
To:        Jeremy Chadwick <jdc@koitsu.org>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: A failed drive causes system to hang
Message-ID:  <5169CCDA.2020901@sneakertech.com>
In-Reply-To: <5169C747.8030806@sneakertech.com>
References:  <mailman.11.1365681601.78138.freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> <51672164.1090908@o2.pl> <20130411212408.GA60159@icarus.home.lan> <5168821F.5020502@o2.pl> <20130412220350.GA82467@icarus.home.lan> <516917CA.5040607@sneakertech.com> <20130413154130.GA877@icarus.home.lan> <5169C747.8030806@sneakertech.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>> Your issue: "on my raidz2 pool, when I lose more than 2 disks, I/O to
>> the pool stalls indefinitely,
>
> Close, but not quite- Yes, io to the pool stalls, but io in general also
> stalls. It appears the problem possibly doesn't start until there's io
> traffic to the pool though.
>
>
>> but I can still use the system barring
>> ZFS-related things;
>
> No. I've responded to this misconception on your part more than once- I
> *CANNOT* use the system in any reliable way, random commands fail. I've
> had it hang trying cd from one dir on the boot volume to another dir on
> the boot volume. The only thing I can *reliably* do is log in. Past that
> point all bets are off.


So, in looking over my thread again from the start, I realize there's 
been an evolution of diagnosis that may not have been immediately obvious.

When I wrote up the description in my initial email, *at that time* I 
thought that io confined to the boot drive was in the clear. However, 
shortly afterwards after doing more tests over the course of the thread, 
I discovered that this was NOT the case.

______________________________________
it has a certain smooth-brained appeal



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5169CCDA.2020901>