Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 22:04:56 +0100 From: Jean-Yves Lefort <jylefort@FreeBSD.org> To: Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, dick@nagual.st Subject: Re: gamin vs fam Message-ID: <20060129220456.01f68e6f.jylefort@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <43DCB258.70304@freebsd.org> References: <20060129122806.4e58ae2d.dick@nagual.st> <43DCB258.70304@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Signature=_Sun__29_Jan_2006_22_04_56_+0100_c5V57iZ2GpAk0i4I Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 13:17:28 +0100 Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org> wrote: > dick hoogendijk schrieb: > > Upgrading my ports collection I noticed a lot of ports that wanted to > > install gamin. This didn't work though, cause files are installed at > > the same place as FAM (already installed on my system as a dep of > > courier). > >=20 > > Running pkgdb -F everytime is not pleasant. What is (are) the advantage > > (s) of gamin over fam? Is it wise to change to gamin? >=20 > The recent change of the USE_FAM default was done without proper testing > - others have already reported problems with gamin, especially in the > case of courier-imap. The first part of your statement is not right. Gamin has been successfully tested by a considerable number of GNOME users during the last 9 months or so. --=20 Jean-Yves Lefort jylefort@FreeBSD.org http://lefort.be.eu.org/ --Signature=_Sun__29_Jan_2006_22_04_56_+0100_c5V57iZ2GpAk0i4I Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD3S34yzD7UaO4AGoRAmDTAJ0YNVSZjn8vyq52w3sHcXiQZd9uyACfZgfS B3FDk8hzLKnhHZmUX3X1khw= =Pm/x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sun__29_Jan_2006_22_04_56_+0100_c5V57iZ2GpAk0i4I--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060129220456.01f68e6f.jylefort>