Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 19:09:33 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Wesley Morgan <morganw@chemikals.org> Cc: leafy <leafy@leafy.idv.tw>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: GCC 3.2.2 import -- questions Message-ID: <20030212030933.GA31362@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20030211210240.M91727@volatile.chemikals.org> References: <20030210204245.E86987@volatile.chemikals.org> <20030211021458.GA18597@leafy.idv.tw> <20030211221139.GA8670@hellraiser.andersa.net> <20030212013800.GA68983@leafy.idv.tw> <20030211210240.M91727@volatile.chemikals.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 09:03:28PM -0500, Wesley Morgan wrote: > On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, leafy wrote: >=20 > > > > > > Anders > > Yes I noticed it this morning too. > > The funny thing is that. If you use a non-P4 optmized GCC to compile lc= ms with P4 opt, then it passes the test. But with a P4 opted GCC, it borks.= Looks like P4 opted GCC itself is bogus. >=20 > That's odd. Does the FreeBSD build skill the stage2 compiler "rebuild"? I > thought the gcc build process tested itself against itself. FreeBSD doesn't use the gcc build process.. Kris --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+SbrtWry0BWjoQKURAgU1AKDUMDP13d/gHdvtN5Md0Ot4jtpe9ACg/1pk GE6s+zKXj3Dx2b3DVQmMRvI= =4xjf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030212030933.GA31362>