Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 17:58:06 +0200 From: Tomasz Pilat <poncki.lists@axelspringer.com.pl> To: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Ports are not ready for CFLAGS=-O2 in 6.0 Message-ID: <34471775.20050705175806@axelspringer.com.pl> In-Reply-To: <42C805F2.4060103@udor.net> References: <20041102222000.GA65845@xor.obsecurity.org> <42C76DF0.8070307@magnesium.net> <20050703055842.GA1933@xor.obsecurity.org> <42C805F2.4060103@udor.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jon,
Sunday, July 3, 2005, 5:36:18 PM, you wrote:
>>>>Therefore, if you compile ports on FreeBSD 6.0, you should set
>>>>CFLAGS=-O -pipe in your /etc/make.conf for now, until we can resolve
>>>>this problem more satisfactorily.
> Does it make sense to introduce a CFLAGS_PORTS option? Basically an
> override used when compiling ports as opposed to world?
Just add something like this to your /etc/make.conf:
.if ${.CURDIR} == "/usr/ports"
CFLAGS= -O -pipe
.elif ${.CURDIR} == "/usr/src"
CFLAGS= -O2 -pipe
.else
CFLAGS= -O3 -pipe
.endif
Ponc
--
Tomasz Pilat http://poncki.freebsd.pl./
AXEL SPRINGER POLSKA Sp. z o.o. PONC-RIPE | PGPKEY-EDEB47FC
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on e-mail/Usenet?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?34471775.20050705175806>