Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 19 Feb 2017 12:59:30 +0100
From:      Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
To:        Nikos Vassiliadis <nvass@gmx.com>
Cc:        freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: unionfs and nullfs combination
Message-ID:  <20170219115930.GX13006@home.opsec.eu>
In-Reply-To: <72a56f7e-8e71-2b98-0978-6de863013ce5@gmx.com>
References:  <72a56f7e-8e71-2b98-0978-6de863013ce5@gmx.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi!

> One relatively cheap way to create thin jails in the pre-ZFS era,
> was to combine nullfs and unionfs (1). This seem to work only in
> 10 and previous branches. Do you use such a combination?

Ah, to correct myself here: We only used unionfs, not in combination
with nullfs. Can you describe why nullfs with unionfs does not
work in 11 ?

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                         3 years to go !



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170219115930.GX13006>