Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 1 Sep 1998 23:35:21 -0500 (CDT)
From:      Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.org>
To:        jdp@polstra.com
Cc:        bde@zeta.org.au, reilly@zeta.org.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: ELF binaries size
Message-ID:  <199809020435.XAA03897@detlev.UUCP>
In-Reply-To: <199809020221.TAA17213@austin.polstra.com> (message from John Polstra on Tue, 01 Sep 1998 19:21:07 -0700)
References:   <199809020221.TAA17213@austin.polstra.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> I think it implies that elf wastes a full page of memory (the space
>> between the ':'s above) most of the time (unless the ':'s are on a
>> page boundary), while aout only wastes an average of half a page
>> (the space between the text ':' and the end of the page).
> But a.out has a repeat of the same situation at the juncture of data
> and bss, and ELF does not.

Not to mention that this wastage only happens after a bit of data in
the first data page is written to.  Before that, it's being shared
with text, anyway.

Happy hacking,
joelh

-- 
Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org - http://www.wp.com/piquan
   Fourth law of programming:
   Anything that can go wrong wi
sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809020435.XAA03897>