Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 12:11:21 +0100 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Peter_Ankerst=E5l?= <peter@pean.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" <stable@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: wpa_supplicant problem. Message-ID: <83317FFF-5A96-43A3-9AFA-3321434C646C@pean.org> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmon6kH7gD6mnh7===btDTdsrt%2BQu0E%2BcrfUGniMnqUcnqA@mail.gmail.com> References: <79AEC286-90EB-41D0-8CA8-18A78D53C3C6@pean.org> <CAJ-Vmonr%2Bx%2BaQ1r=Sedyz3eq8sdoidxJvKtY5Gp_8WXsbzTCeA@mail.gmail.com> <8CFBC6B5-B683-4EC3-9561-EFFA6CE55755@pean.org> <CAJ-VmokeEPBq1Tz=abJ6qmWzzn9vWH0Pno4sJ1GLHUh5iq8Qcw@mail.gmail.com> <52CD0CEE.5010700@pean.org> <CAJ-Vmon6kH7gD6mnh7===btDTdsrt%2BQu0E%2BcrfUGniMnqUcnqA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08 Jan 2014, at 18:46, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 8 January 2014 00:31, Peter Ankerst=E5l <peter@pean.org> wrote: >> Hehe, >>=20 >> I dont think Im ready for 11 yet. Do you think these fixes will be in = 10 any >> time soon? >=20 > I can try backporting the EAPOL fix(es) to HEAD but it may involve = other fixes. >=20 > I'll take a look. Just as an experiment i tried in my own stupidity to =93implement=94 = your change in r257947 of if_iwn.c and just added the extra if statement, but at last that did not change = anything.=20 /Peter.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?83317FFF-5A96-43A3-9AFA-3321434C646C>