Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 11 May 1996 14:35:12 -0400 (EDT)
From:      "matthew c. mead" <mmead@Glock.COM>
To:        phk@critter.tfs.com (Poul-Henning Kamp)
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 6x86 120+
Message-ID:  <199605111835.OAA13611@neon.Glock.COM>
In-Reply-To: <5891.831836840@critter.tfs.com> from "Poul-Henning Kamp" at May 11, 96 05:47:20 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp writes:

> >     I just got one of these the other day and installed it.  I've
> > read before that they accept the full pentium instruction set.
> > For all but a few things, it's a fair amount faster than my
> > P90(@100).  I did notice that these applications that seem slower
> > are built with pgcc pentium optimization.  Does anyone know if I
> > need to build with -m486 to get better performance out of this
> > chip, or should I stick with -mpentium?  Thanks!

> >From what I have heard so far you should only use -mpentium for the P5.
> Most of the newer chips run slower with the pentium opts. because the 
> attempted dual parallel sequences of instructions defeat the lookahead
> of the logic in charge of the "RISCification".

> Can we have a number for the FreeBSD-stones ?

> 	cd /usr/src
> 	rm -rf /usr/obj/*
> 	time make world

	Will do it later today - once I'm through moving services
around between my new machines.



-matt

-- 
Matthew C. Mead

mmead@Glock.COM
http://www.Glock.COM/~mmead/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605111835.OAA13611>