Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:45:21 -0700 From: Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com> To: Allan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: stopped processes using cpu? Message-ID: <10AEB4BC-B1B3-4312-A36C-ECE33EC56805@kientzle.com> In-Reply-To: <53F3A564.8070202@freebsd.org> References: <CAA3ZYrAzpxpFNST5ZT-zHvk4Gg38w-yH1dTQj53Fp_rM-hohaA@mail.gmail.com> <53F3A564.8070202@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Aug 19, 2014, at 12:28 PM, Allan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 2014-08-19 15:21, Dieter BSD wrote: >> 8.2 on amd64 >> Top(1) with no arguments reports that some firefox processes are = using cpu >> dispite being stopped (via kill -stop pid) for at least several = hours. >> Adding -C doesn't change the numbers. Ps(1) reports the same. >> Interestingly, a firefox that isn't stopped is (correctly?) reported = as >> using 0 cpu. The 100% idle should be correct, but who knows. >>=20 >> last pid: 51932; load averages: 0.07, 0.99, 1.42 up 14+19:02:56 = 08:48:28 >> 267 processes: 1 running, 138 sleeping, 128 stopped >> CPU: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 100% = idle >> Mem: 1665M Active, 653M Inact, 240M Wired, 95M Cache, 372M Buf, 815M = Free >> Swap: 8965M Total, 560K Used, 8965M Free >>=20 >> PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU = COMMAND >> 44188 a 9 44 0 303M 187M STOP 113:19 13.43% = firefox-bin >> 92986 b 11 44 0 164M 62848K STOP 0:18 5.03% = firefox-bin >> 16507 c 11 44 0 189M 88976K STOP 0:13 0.24% = firefox-bin >> 2265 root 1 44 0 248M 193M select 625:38 0.00% Xorg >> 51271 d 10 44 0 233M 128M ucond 12:12 0.00% = firefox-bin >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>=20 >=20 > I wonder if jhb@'s new top code solves this. He adjusted the way CPU > usage is tracked to be more responsive, and not based on averages I wonder if jhb@=92s new top code fixes the whacky WCPU values we=92ve = been seeing on FreeBSD/ARM. (1713% CPU is a little hard to believe on a = single-core board ;-). Tim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?10AEB4BC-B1B3-4312-A36C-ECE33EC56805>