Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:50:47 +0000
From:      Joe Holden <joe@joeholden.co.uk>
To:        Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu>
Cc:        UNIX - Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Totally stumped - very long post
Message-ID:  <45632057.2080706@joeholden.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <3974ECF15478CC1AAEE19789@utd59514.utdallas.edu>
References:  <BFE16982B9EB3D6BADF911A8@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local>	<B0018098-1130-4D89-9774-1B241737D6FD@dpcsys.com>	<2A97A175E0A3D7A039D1AA98@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local>	<456297CE.9030103@joeholden.co.uk> <3974ECF15478CC1AAEE19789@utd59514.utdallas.edu>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On Tuesday, November 21, 2006 06:08:14 +0000 Joe Holden 
> <joe@joeholden.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>> Here's something odd.  If I change the first octet to anything other
>>> than 66, the traceroutes run normally.  But if I leave the first octet
>>> at 66 and change any of the other octets, they all return host is down.
>>> I double checked, and the defaultrouter is 66.221.96.1 in /etc/rc.conf.
>> Well of course, double check your routing table ;) (hint: second route
>> entry)
>>
> Care to give me a bigger hint?  I'm not a routing guru.
> 
> I tried this with no luck:
> route delete 66
> route: writing to routing socket: No such process
> delete host 66: not in table
> 
> Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
> Senior Information Security Analyst
> The University of Texas at Dallas
> http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
route delete -net 66 should do it



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45632057.2080706>