Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 14:22:30 +0000 From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@aciri.org> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, bmilekic@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Solved (Re: -current vs. -stable network performance) Message-ID: <20011214142230.A36294@walton.maths.tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: <20011214031657.A47836@iguana.aciri.org>; from rizzo@aciri.org on Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 03:16:57AM -0800 References: <20011214021109.B46985@iguana.aciri.org> <20011214103436.7931438CC@overcee.netplex.com.au> <20011214031657.A47836@iguana.aciri.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 03:16:57AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > How about fixing it for real as described in the commit message? > > The real fix, for me, is the one-line change to M_LEADINGSPACE. > The one described in the commit message was just Bosko's point of > view, with which I and many others disagree, and which requires an > extensive scrutiny of the code and a change of the commonly understood > semantics in M_LEADINGSPACE. I think we should make this change for the moment as it doesn't change the current meaning of M_LEADINGSPACE and seems to improve performance a bit. Later, we can decide if changing the meaning of M_LEADINGSPACE is a useful thing to do. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011214142230.A36294>