Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 17:20:05 +0200 From: Oliver Lehmann <lehmann@ans-netz.de> To: joseph.koshy@gmail.com Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: low(er) disk performance with sched_4bsd then with sched_ule Message-ID: <20050915172005.072f4bdf.lehmann@ans-netz.de> In-Reply-To: <84dead7205091500152a7c25d1@mail.gmail.com> References: <20050914194612.15692485.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <43286E37.40203@samsco.org> <20050914222013.178dc4dc.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <84dead72050914135239514c49@mail.gmail.com> <20050915000053.448f251b.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <84dead7205091500152a7c25d1@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Joseph Koshy wrote: > What happens if you use a kernel with 'options NO_ADAPTIVE_MUTEXES' ? I'll try this and respond back > [Could you please post your kernel config, and the output of a dmesg after > a boot]. http://pofo.de/tmp/NUDEL http://pofo.de/tmp/dmesg.nudel -- Oliver Lehmann http://www.pofo.de/ http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050915172005.072f4bdf.lehmann>