Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 01:03:21 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> To: Sheldon Hearn <axl@iafrica.com> Cc: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>, yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: another syscons update Message-ID: <199901201703.BAA20981@spinner.netplex.com.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 20 Jan 1999 18:46:08 %2B0200." <73149.916850768@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > > On Thu, 21 Jan 1999 00:29:54 +0800, Peter Wemm wrote: > > > 'make depend' really does work, and is quite safe. Cleaning the tree > > should be a very rare requirement. > > Perhaps the chap sitting next to me and I are just unlucky. Between the > two of us, we've needed to use ``config -r'' three times since moving > over to CURRENT about two weeks ago. What I pity we didn't save > typescripts for the failures this corrected. :( It's worked a few times in a row for me; some samples: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT #384: Sat Jan 16 17:23:36 WST 1999 FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT #111: Sat Jan 16 14:39:22 WST 1999 FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT #265: Wed Jan 20 06:02:36 WST 1999 FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT #61: Mon Jan 18 19:33:08 WST 1999 The first machine has been doing 'config -n' since 1996, with (when necessary) a make clean. It was doing early SMP development which tended to have some scarey consequences on filesystems at times. :-] Are you sure you're doing a 'make depend' after each config(8) run and after building for the first time after a cvsup run or cvs update? Yes, a 'make depend' is required whenever the sources change any of their include files. > Ciao, > Sheldon. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Netplex Consulting "No coffee, No workee!" :-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901201703.BAA20981>