Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 31 Oct 2011 17:22:33 -0700
From:      Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To:        Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: request: merging if_ath_tx branch to HEAD
Message-ID:  <CAJ-Vmon7CiVJs1S9jrWx9%2B6PjhxVcQyp2kQdkQ49Gcvtzq3-PA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EAF18B2.9040909@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <CAJ-Vmokj=BJjSrdvM8DxD4PJScakP4N_Kjt_AbF%2B8=hM_CWX5A@mail.gmail.com> <4EAF18B2.9040909@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 31 October 2011 14:52, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote:

>> The code is a bit messy and it's still a work in progress but I'd
>> rather tidy it up in -HEAD. Otherwise I'm stuck in the unfortunate
>> situation of having to keep merging between the if_ath_tx branch and
>> -HEAD.
>
> Is this work that is planned to be migrated to 9.0-RELEASE? If not,
> shouldn't it wait till after the release?

Well, it depends on how long 9.0-RELEASE is going to take. If it's
going to take days, then sure I can wait. But if it's going to take
weeks, I'll likely _have_ the rest of the if_ath_tx missing pieces
done and ready for merge into 9.0.

In any case, I do want to merge the ath 11n stuff into -9, so even if
it's not done by 9.0, it'll be done shortly after.



Adrian



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmon7CiVJs1S9jrWx9%2B6PjhxVcQyp2kQdkQ49Gcvtzq3-PA>