Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 20 Sep 2021 21:18:19 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        net@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 258527] wpa_supplicant(8) from the base is not able to bring up wlan(4) interface correctly due to SIGSEGV after EAP/PEAP MSCHAPv2 authentication
Message-ID:  <bug-258527-7501-BtPaWe5DrR@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-258527-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-258527-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D258527

Marek Zarychta <zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|Affects Some People         |Affects Only Me

--- Comment #16 from Marek Zarychta <zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl> ---
We should all take it easy, it is a minor breakage and probably no other se=
tups
except mine are affected. On the other hand, the security/wpa_supplicant fr=
om
ports still works as intended.

The QA process takes some time, the same for debugging and writing patches,=
 but
also taking dumps and testing patches requires some time and effort includi=
ng
either driving tens of miles or recreating EAP/PEAP secured network in the =
home
lab.=20=20

I have no insight into @freebsd.org e-mail server setup, but believe it does
some false positives marking messages as SPAM what makes writing direct ema=
il
messages a bit hopeless.

The first conclusion: "no other setups are probably affected" is pretty sad=
 and
means that FreeBSD's user base became FreeBSD's consumer base. I have repor=
ted
this breakage a week or two ago on the net@ mailing list and there was no
feedback at all. The FreeBSD consumer base utilizes probably only RELEASEs =
and
cares neither for the development process nor for the quality of the upcomi=
ng
product.

The final question which comes here is: Do we really need wpa_supplicant in=
 the
base? I was against ftpd(8) removal which IMHO is an imminent part of the
FreeBSD OS, but wpa_supplicant can be easily installed from ports. Consumers
who have only WiFi access can have the package on the USB stick.

Kind regards,=20
FreeBSD User

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-258527-7501-BtPaWe5DrR>