Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 Sep 2000 09:32:23 +0300
From:      "Ari Suutari" <ari@suutari.iki.fi>
To:        "Julian Elischer" <julian@elischer.org>, "Patrick Bihan-Faou" <patrick@mindstep.com>
Cc:        <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: natd and userland ppp
Message-ID:  <004d01c02915$e0656f90$0e05a8c0@intranet.syncrontech.com>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.10.10009270922150.15101-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,



> One good reason is that the PPP IP address is dynamically assigned and
> NATD doesn't work so well in such a dynamic environment.
> They are both running the same NAT library, but is you use NATD then the
> packet is diverted to userland TWICE, with it's
> attendant reduction in throughput and increase in latency..
>
> PPP diverts packet out of the kernel once. Once it's diverted you might as
> well do the NAT on the packet. (and as I said, you'd have a lot of fun
> getting NATD synchronised with ppp. (You'd have to use all sorts of
> link-up and link-down scripts.

    I think that this is not true. Just use -dynamic flag in natd and
    it will automatically track down address changes on ppp interface.


        Ari S.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?004d01c02915$e0656f90$0e05a8c0>