Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:35:13 -0800 From: David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org> To: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> Cc: Ian Lepore <freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org>, "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl> Subject: Re: 9.1-RC3 feels okay :-) Message-ID: <15C29F34-C400-4578-95EF-9708FAC2AF0F@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1211070918050.41254@wonkity.com> References: <201211070106.qA716QhS013858@fire.js.berklix.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1211070918050.41254@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7 Nov 2012, at 08:20, Warren Block wrote: > It's not saying that hald is run by default, merely that xorg-server = will try to use it by default. And will fail to detect any input devices if hald is not running, but = will correctly detect them if the X server is compiled without HAL = support. Please can we fix the defaults for xorg-server to do the = sensible thing? David=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15C29F34-C400-4578-95EF-9708FAC2AF0F>