Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 12:51:31 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: java@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237054] java/openjdk11: Needs to be integrated into bsd.java.mk Message-ID: <bug-237054-8522-La3l0RCCK8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-237054-8522@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-237054-8522@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237054 --- Comment #26 from Tommy P <tommyhp2@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #25) I'm not confused about OpenJDK vs Oracle JDK vs Oracle OpenJDK. Like I said before about nothing concrete on OpenJDK' EOL. The link you've cited states only the transfer of stewardship from Oracle to Red Hat. I think we should stop here since I don't think this is the right platform for lengthy discussions about which version is better and SDLC's best practices. The main goals of my proposed patch are: 1) Specific version usage for different use cases I've mentioned previously similar to OpenSSL 2) Added versions 11 & 12 for the pioneers 3) The default version is for those taking the minimalist configuration / customization approach. Thus, regardless of whichever version the porting team decides to use as default, the patch would provide anyone the freedom to choose for her/his scenarios. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-237054-8522-La3l0RCCK8>