Date: Fri, 21 Jul 1995 21:54:27 -0700 From: Imperial Irrigation District <iidpwr@lightlink.satcom.net> To: iidpwr@lightlink.satcom.net, jkh@time.cdrom.com Cc: freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com, hsu@cs.hut.fi, jmacd@freefall.cdrom.com, karl@mcs.com, terry@cs.weber.edu Subject: Re: What people are doing with FBSD Message-ID: <199507220454.VAA11103@lightlink.satcom.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
What suggestion? Provide an upgrade path? Trust me, we're working on it! :-) Sorry, I didn't make myself clear. The suggestions refer to (1) seperate the configuration data from the executable scripts such as rc, rc.local, netstart, ...etc. The advantage of seperating the configuration data from the executable scripts is easier to debug for both the user and the developer. (2) provide an upgrade path. That would speed up the development too because the current developer can upgrade to the latest and greatest. Moreover, that would close the gap between commercial grade OS and non-commercial OS. Most importantly provide an upgrade path is user friendly. Make the user happy.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199507220454.VAA11103>