Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:50:12 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SMP buildworld times / performance tests Message-ID: <1799.954492612@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 30 Mar 2000 09:15:54 -0800." <200003301715.JAA73702@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200003301715.JAA73702@apollo.backplane.com>, Matthew Dillon writes: > The general problem with the timecounter is that not only is the hardware > indeterminant, but the timecounter structure itself is *NOT* MP safe, > at least not by my read of it. Well, read again then :-) I've had a paper in the works about timecounters for over a year now, I should really sit down and finish it. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1799.954492612>