Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 11:14:27 +0100 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 Message-ID: <8664nwrbp8.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20060203102603.C59587@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> (Harti Brandt's message of "Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:27:32 %2B0100 (CET)") References: <20060201165326.6E44E7302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20060201180223.O52964@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <43E0F41C.5020907@samsco.org> <86fyn242w0.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203090804.Q59587@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <86irrwre3y.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203102603.C59587@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Harti Brandt <hartmut.brandt@dlr.de> writes: > I have everything out-of-the-box - no special CFLAGS. The tinderbox uses -O2. It is possible that -O2 causes gcc to generate code which is slightly larger (but also slightly faster) in some cases. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8664nwrbp8.fsf>