Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 17:34:56 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: nate@mt.sri.com, questions@freefall.freebsd.org, jkh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: questions-digest V1 #1174 Message-ID: <199607312334.RAA04496@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199607312331.QAA21986@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> References: <199607312324.RAA04427@rocky.mt.sri.com> <199607312331.QAA21986@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> * vs. a 'non-Motif' binary? (Unfortunately, I don't have Motif or I'd do > * the comparison myself, or at least build a local package that uses > * Motif. :( > > Unfortunately I can't either, as somebody seems to have erased Motif > from thud. Jordan, can you reinstall it please? Heck, just uuencode the Motif development package and post it to the list. That way *all* of us can check to see how big Motif is and determine if we like it better. *grin* Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199607312334.RAA04496>