Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:26:47 +0300 (MSK) From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> To: Ian Dowse <iedowse@iedowse.com> Cc: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Alex Rodin <alx@sm.ukrtel.net>, David Coder <dacoder@dcoder.net>, freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb to serial Message-ID: <20061110142347.J95402@mp2.macomnet.net> In-Reply-To: <200611101109.aa29582@nowhere.iedowse.com> References: <200611101109.aa29582@nowhere.iedowse.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, 11:09-0000, Ian Dowse wrote: > In message <200611101157.19387.hselasky@c2i.net>, Hans Petter Selasky writes: > >On Friday 10 November 2006 10:08, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > >> The second question: is it OK to commit uark(4) as is and then convert > >> it to the new model? > > > >I would prefer no. It is better to commit "uark(4)" to the USB p4 project, > >than HEAD, because then we don't have to worry about integrating the driver. > > If the driver works, then there should be no need to hold off on > committing it to -CURRENT. Having it in -CURRENT now allows it to > be MFC'd to RELENG_6 sooner. From a quick glance it looks fine to > me, so I'd say just go ahead and commit it Maxim. Yes, it works. I'd prefer to commit it first and then adopt for a new model too. Thank you both! -- Maxim Konovalov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061110142347.J95402>