Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1998 14:12:14 +0100 From: "nunnari" <roberto.nunnari@agie.ch> To: keith@apcs.com.au Cc: questions <questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: 2.2.7 - 2.2.8 - 3.0 Message-ID: <3663EB2C.788D4756@agie.ch> References: <XFMail.981201213542.keith@apcs.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Keith, Why don't use 3.0? It's right the one I just installed... ...Maybe I should have asked before downloading it during the past week!!! Isn't 3.0 stable? Keith Anderson wrote: > Hi > > On 01-Dec-98 nunnari wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > could anybody tell me what are the main differences between > > 2.2.7 - 2.2.8 - 3.0 ??? > > 2.2.7-RELEASE A good stabe version > 2.2.8-RELEASE todays new release with some security things reworked > 3.0-RELEASE don't use it unless U have run 2.2.7-Release for 12 months > > Keith > > > > > which should be the more stable? > > which should offer the best performance > > and which should offer the best develop environment? > > > > Thanks and bye. > > Robi. > > WWW : www.geocities.com/SunsetStrip/3935 > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > --- > ---------------------------------- > E-Mail: Keith Anderson <keith@apcs.com.au> > Date: 01-Dec-98 > Time: 21:33:08 > Satelite Service 64K to 2Meg > This message was sent by XFMail > ---------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3663EB2C.788D4756>